Search This Blog

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

There was a Terror Attack! Registered Trademark; - Mossad - (Nairobi Mall Attack False Flag)



There was a Terror Attack! Registered Trademark; - Mossad - (Nairobi Mall Attack False Flag)

From Michel Rivero @  http://whatreallyhappened.com/:

Al-Shabaab has released the names of the attackers in the weekend mall siege in Nairobi, Kenya, and they include at least six Americans, two from Minnesota, one from Kansas City, as well as one each from Maine, Illinois, and Arizona.

Why on Earth would Al-Shabaab release the names of the attackers? Did "Al Qaeda" release the names of the 9-11 hijackers? More and more this is feeling like a propaganda "prequel" to a major false-flag attack here in the US, in FEMA Region III, the first of October.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________


The Israeli Mossad has their agents in Kenya (How did they know ahead of time that this shooting was to take place?) and that the Mossad is working with Kenyan authorities to put an end to this violent attack. THIS alone should alert everyone that this is indeed a staged event, considering the motto of the murderous Mossad: "By Way Of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War"!

Is it not amazing to everyone how the Mossad is in the right place at just the right time, and is working to end this violent attack by "evil" Muslims? Come on, now.... Anyone can see that this is just another fraud to push the UN agenda for gun control, and at the same time with the Mossad "conveniently" being in Kenya at just the right time, being used to make the criminal and terrorist state of Israel look suddenly like the "good guys" to the entire world......

http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.ca/2013/09/kenyan-mall-false-flag-attack-camera.html

________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: http://www.mossad.gov.il/Eng/AboutUs.aspx    

The Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations, otherwise known as the Mossad, has been appointed by the State of Israel to collect information, analyze intelligence, and perform special covert operations beyond its borders.

"Where no counsel is, the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety"
Proverbs XI/14.

Over the years, the Mossad has expanded into many fields, the most prominent of which are:
Covert intelligence gathering beyond Israel’s borders.
Preventing the development and procurement of non-conventional weapons by hostile countries.
Preventing terrorist acts against Israeli targets abroad.
Developing and maintaining special diplomatic and other covert relations.
Bringing Jews home from countries where official Aliya agencies are not allowed to operate.
Producing strategic, political and operational intelligence.
Planning and carrying out special operations beyond Israel’s borders.
________________________________________________________________________________________________



This appears to be some type of blatantly staged false flag event, is this the run-up to a new 9/11 by Israeli and American operatives?

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
September 23, 2013

The terrorist group behind the Kenyan mall  siege has threatened to carry out even bigger attacks, labeling the bloodbath that has already claimed at least 62 lives merely a prelude to “the real deal.”


After this drill, were going to carry out the real deal soon!” stated a Twitter message attributed to the Al-Shabab terrorist group. Twitter quickly suspended the account, but it keeps reappearing under derivations of the name ‘@HSM_PRESOFFICE’.
The tweet also mentioned an individual by the name of Gulled Ali Mohamed, sending a message to his family that Mohamed was not in the Westgate shopping mall but was with the “5th squad,” which is preparing another attack.

On Saturday, up to 15 Al-Shabab militants stormed the Westgate shopping complex in Nairobi and began killing civilians. According to reports, the victims were subjected to a test in order to ascertain whether or not they were Muslims. Non-Muslims were either taken hostage or brutally slaughtered. Children and pregnant women were among the victims.
The attack was launched in protest against Kenya’s occupation of Somalia, which the terrorists are seeking to turn into a jihadist state.
Kenyan security forces claim they are close to ending the siege and that almost all of the hostages have now been freed.
The Al Shabab terror group is the African branch of Al-Qaeda, and is ideologically aligned with the same jihadists that the US and NATO backed in Libya and are currently supporting in Syria.
The 2011 invasion of Libya expanded Al-Qaeda’s operational capacity in both Africa and the Middle East.
________________________________________________________________________________________________

Kenyan Bloodbath: Reaping the "Benefits" of US AFRICOM Collaboration

NATO's North African terror tidal wave predictably sweeps into Kenya.

September 23, 2013 (Tony Cartalucci) - At face value, and how the Western media is attempting to portray it, the Westgate Mall siege in Kenya's capital city of Nairobi appears to be yet another senseless terrorist attack by the "religious fanatics" of Al Qaeda's Somalia franchise, Al Shabaab. Already, both Kenyan and Western politicians, as well as editorials across the Western media, are attempting to use the attack as a pretext to launch a military campaign against neighboring Somalia, while fueling anti-Muslim sentiment across profoundly ignorant audiences in the West.

A telling op-ed in USA Today titled, "Nairobi mall attack strikes against all of us: Column" states in its subtitle that:
As on 9/11, terrorists are waging a war on our modern, democratic way of life. Today, we are all Kenyans.
The op-ed continues by stating:
Just as important: The fight is not just a Kenyan, or African, fight. Somalia could be the new Afghanistan. A lawless, fundamentalist Somalia could incubate a Somali Osama bin Laden and new attacks on the USA, just as Afghanistan protected and nurtured bin Laden and al-Qaeda.
And:
After the Nairobi attack, the message should be "We Are All Kenyans." Not just in our sympathy. But also in going all out to prevent another terrorist attack.
Leaving Somalia to al-Shabab is not an option.
Kenya: Proxy for US Aggression in Africa

What the USA Today op-ed fails to mention, even as it alludes to impending military intervention in Somalia, is that Kenya has already participated in military operations against its northern neighbor, including a full-scale military invasion complete with US and French military support in 2011. In the UK Independent's October 2011 article, "Somali invasion backed by West, says Kenya," it was reported that:
Kenya has confirmed that Western allies have joined its war on Islamic militants al-Shabaab despite denials from the US and France that they are involved in fighting in southern Somalia. Foreign military forces have carried out air strikes and a naval bombardment close to the militant stronghold of Kismayo, a Kenyan army spokesman said yesterday.
“There are certainly other actors in this theatre carrying out other attacks,” said Kenya's Major Emmanuel Chirchir.
The Kenyan invasion has already caused a major rift between Somalia's interim prime minister and president, who yesterday condemned the presence of foreign troops inside his country.
While the US attempted to deny any role in the invasion, it has admittedly carried out periodic airstrikes and drone strikes across Somalia, as reported by the BBC's 2012 article, "Somalia air strike 'kills foreign al-Shabab militants':"
The US military, which has a base in neighbouring Djibouti, has previously carried out drone strikes in Somalia.
It has also launched air strikes against alleged al-Qaeda militants in the country.
Before using Kenya as a proxy for US aggression in Africa, and amidst two decades of unilateral, covert military operations, the US had backed two Ethiopian invasions into Somalia. The first US-backed invasion, under then US President George Bush, was carried out in 2006. USA Today reported in its 2007 article, "U.S. support key to Ethiopia's invasion," that:
The United States has quietly poured weapons and military advisers into Ethiopia, whose recent invasion of Somalia opened a new front in the Bush administration's war on terrorism.
The second US-backed Ethiopian invasion of Somalia, under US President Barack Obama, was carried out in 2011 - coordinated with Kenya's 2011 US-French-backed extraterritorial adventure into Somali territory. The UK Independent's December 2011 article, "UN-backed invasion of Somalia spirals into chaos," reported that:
Kenya's invasion of Somalia, hailed by the West and the UN Security Council, was meant to deliver a knockout blow to the militant Islamist group al-Shabaab. Instead it has pulled Somalia's regional rival Ethiopia back into the country, stirred up the warlords and rekindled popular support for fundamentalists whose willingness to let Somalis starve rather than receive foreign aid had left them widely hated.
It was in fact this US-backed military invasion that served as the alleged motivation of the Al Shabaab terrorists who attacked Kenya's Westgate Mall this week.

The Same Terrorists the US is Arming in Syria are Killing Civilians in Kenya

Beginning in 2011, geopolitical analysts warned that US, British and French intervention in Libya would create a terror emirate that would unleash a tidal wave of militant destabilization across Northern Africa and beyond. From Mali to Kenya, and as far as Syria, violence directly linked to the militants and the aid and weapons they received from the West in Libya, have now been felt.


Image: (click image to enlarge) Truly NATO's intervention in Libya has been a resounding success. Not only has the West managed to revive the terrorist LIFG organization Qaddafi had been fighting successfully for decades, but now "international institutions" have a casus belli spreading across the whole of North Africa, into the Middle East and beyond as NATO weapons and Western cash enable LIFG fighters to battle as far as Syria in the east and Mali to the west. The wave of terror unleashed and the predictable "pretexts" it will provide, has now swept into Kenya.
....


Shortly after NATO's intervention in Libya, it was Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), a US State Department listed terror organization (listed #38), that played a central role in the invasion of northern Mali, which provided the pretext for French military intervention and occupation. AQIM of course, was merged with Al Qaeda's Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), the ground troops used in NATO's regime change operation in Libya starting in 2011. In a 2007 West Point Combating Terrorism Center (CTC) report and a 2011 CTC report, "Are Islamist Extremists Fighting Among Libya's Rebels?," AQIM is specifically mentioned as working closely with the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG). The latter report admits:
There have also been reports during the past few years of a handful of Libyans who have traveled to Algeria to train with al-Qa`ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), although these reports are unconfirmed. AQIM has sought to capitalize on the situation in Libya
Geopolitical analyst Pepe Escobar would elaborate in an Asia Times piece titled, "How al-Qaeda got to rule in Tripoli," that:
"Crucially, still in 2007, then al-Qaeda's number two, Zawahiri, officially announced the merger between the LIFG and al-Qaeda in the Islamic Mahgreb (AQIM). So, for all practical purposes, since then, LIFG/AQIM have been one and the same - and Belhaj was/is its emir. "
"Belhaj," referring to Hakim Abdul Belhaj, leader of LIFG in Libya, led with NATO support, arms, funding, and diplomatic recognition, the overthrowing of Muammar Qaddafi and has now plunged the nation into racist genocidal infighting. This intervention has also seen the rebellion's epicenter of Benghazi peeling off from Tripolias a semi-autonomous "Terror-Emirate." Belhaj's latest campaign has shifted to Syria where he was admittedly on the Turkish-Syrian border pledging weapons, money, and fighters to the so-called "Free Syrian Army," again, under the auspices of NATO support.

The torrent of militants and weapons flowing from Libya into Syria to support Western-backed regime change against the Syrian government has been extensively documented over the last 2+ years.

In November 2011, the Telegraph in their article, "Leading Libyan Islamist met Free Syrian Army opposition group," would report:
Abdulhakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli Military Council and the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, "met with Free Syrian Army leaders in Istanbul and on the border with Turkey," said a military official working with Mr Belhadj. "Mustafa Abdul Jalil (the interim Libyan president) sent him there."
Another Telegraph article, "Libya’s new rulers offer weapons to Syrian rebels," would admit
Syrian rebels held secret talks with Libya's new authorities on Friday, aiming to secure weapons and money for their insurgency against President Bashar al-Assad's regime, The Daily Telegraph has learned.
At the meeting, which was held in Istanbul and included Turkish officials, the Syrians requested "assistance" from the Libyan representatives and were offered arms, and potentially volunteers.
"There is something being planned to send weapons and even Libyan fighters to Syria," said a Libyan source, speaking on condition of anonymity. "There is a military intervention on the way. Within a few weeks you will see."
Later that month, some 600 Libyan terrorists would be reported to have entered Syria to begin combat operations and as recently as last month, CNN, whose Ivan Watson accompanied terrorists over the Turkish-Syrian border and into Aleppo, revealed that indeed foreign fighters were amongst the militants, particularly Libyans. It was admitted that:
Meanwhile, residents of the village where the Syrian Falcons were headquartered said there were fighters of several North African nationalities also serving with the brigade's ranks.
A volunteer Libyan fighter has also told CNN he intends to travel from Turkey to Syria within days to add a "platoon" of Libyan fighters to armed movement.
CNN also added:
On Wednesday, CNN’s crew met a Libyan fighter who had crossed into Syria from Turkey with four other Libyans. The fighter wore full camouflage and was carrying a Kalashnikov rifle. He said more Libyan fighters were on the way.

The foreign fighters, some of them are clearly drawn because they see this as … a jihad. So this is a magnet for jihadists who see this as a fight for Sunni Muslims.
CNN's reports provide bookends to 2011's admissions that large numbers of Libyan terrorists flush with NATO cash and weapons had headed to Syria, with notorious terrorist LIFG commanders making the arrangements.

Al Shabaab - Al Qaeda's Somali franchise - is also directly linked to AQIM and the myriad of other Al Qaeda extremist subsidiaries, including Libya's LIFG, and the more recently christened Al Nusra front in Syria. The BBC in its 2012 report titled, "Africa's Islamist militants 'co-ordinate efforts'," stated:
Three of Africa's largest militant Islamist groups are trying to co-ordinate their efforts, the head of the US Africa Command has warned.
Gen Carter Ham said in particular North African al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) was probably sharing explosives and funds with Nigeria's Boko Haram.
Speaking in Washington, he said the separatist movement in northern Mali had provided AQIM with a "safe haven".
Somalia's al-Shabab was the other "most dangerous" group, he said.
This cooperation between AQIM, Boko Haram, and Al Shabaab has been clearly bolstered by the immense influx of NATO-provided cash and weapons flowing into Libya first to overthrow the Libyan government, then to be shipped to Syria to overthrow the government there. NATO's assistance in expanding Al Qaeda's operational capacity in North Africa can only be helping terrorists like those behind the Kenya Westgate Mall siege carry out cross-border operations of this scale.

Despite attempts by the West to provide other explanations as to where Al Qaeda is receiving its funds, manpower, and arsenal to carry out global campaigns, it is clear that it is a product of state-sponsorship - states like the US, UK, France, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Qatar, Turkey, Jordan, and others.

Indeed, Al Shabaab's attack in Kenya is abhorrent, unjustifiable terrorism - however, what Kenyans and the world as a whole must remember, is who armed them, who continuously props them up, provides them entire nations (Libya) as safe havens, and swells their ranks and armories with billions in cash and thousands of tons of weaponry at a time in war zones like Syria.

Al Shabaab's continued existence, along with its counterparts AQIM across Northern Africa, LIFG in Libya, Boko Haram in Nigeria, and Al Nusra in Syria, is due entirely to both covert and overt Western military and financial backing. The blood of Kenya's innocent are on the hands of those within the Kenyan government willfully serving as a proxy for US aggression across Africa, and those across the West using Al Qaeda as a geopolitical tool to achieve their global objectives.

Al Qaeda: The Perfect Pretext to Invade, The Perfect Mercenary Army to Covertly Wage War

Al Qaeda, for the West, serves as the ultimate geopolitical tool. It can be used as a pretext to invade, as well as a nearly inexhaustible mercenary army to carry out ruthless terrorist campaigns and even full-scale war as seen in Syria and Libya, to achieve Western objectives. Additionally, the omnipresent, nebulous nature of Al Qaeda serves as justification to strip away the rights and liberties of people at home, across Western civilization - perpetuating a climate of fear within which the seeds of very profitable war can be sown and continuously reaped.

How profitable? A Harvard's Kennedy School research paper titled, "The Financial Legacy of Iraq and Afghanistan," places the total expenditures of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars alone somewhere between 4-6 trillion dollars. That isn't 4-6 trillion dollars that went into a black hole. That is 4-6 trillion dollars that went to the Fortune 500 corporations that engineered and sold these conflicts to the American public in the first place.

The Washington Post in its recent article, "Americans are tweeting about ‘Syria’ almost as much as ‘twerking’ – sometimes more," celebrated the general public's ignorance regarding geopolitics. It stated:
The fact that more people are discuss twerking than Syria is not necessarily bad news. They share, as Floating Sheep notes, “little in common apart from recent media attention”: One is a pop culture phenomenon (both more fun and more accessible to a wider swath of the population) and one is a tragic, complicated news event halfway around the world (critically important, but not very fun — particularly on a platform many use for recreation).
It continued by claiming:
Of course, even if you polled all 300 million Americans on their relative interest in twerking and Syria, twerking would probably win — and that’s okay, too. There are many justifiable reasons why an individual or a population wouldn’t care about foreign news — things like a lack of education and limited access to computers or newspapers.
It is this " lack of education" that the Washington Post's editorial board and the special interests that steer it, claim is "okay too," that allows these special interests to continue to use Al Qaeda both as the ultimate villain and to swell the ranks of its inexhaustible global "freedom fighters."

The aforementioned USA Today editorial seeking to exploit the latest tragedy in Kenya also warned:
The Nairobi shopping mall attack is heartbreaking. The stories could so easily be American stories.
For the real interests driving and solely benefiting from Al Qaeda's campaign of global terror, should they decide these stories need to be "American," they will be, unless we rectify the "lack of education" these special interests have carefully cultivated and reassuringly claim is "okay."


_______________________________________________________________________________________________


Absolute Proof the Nairobi Mall Attack is a Zionist Hoax


Other Hoaxes Zionist Terror — 22 September 2013

 Absolute Proof the Nairobi Mall Attack is a Zionist Hoax
The attack in Kenya, as well as the attack in Pakistan, has revived the regime’s global plot to conquer the people of Islaam on behalf of Zionist Jews. Jewry media is running at high speed after these two false flag acts. The Pakistan attack must also be thoroughly investigated. The timing puts the onus on the Mahyudi monsters of the Mossad, who are surely the force behind the Nairobi hoax.
As a client state of the Israeli entity, completely subservient to the Zionist powers, Kenya is an ideal facility for the commission of great crimes on behalf of the Zionist regime.
This was done in the 2004 American Embassy bombing, where the Zionists—Mossad agents—placed and detonated the bombs that blew the embassy to smithereens while killing 200 people. Compliant then as it is now the Kenyan rulership wrongfully blamed Muslims and Islaam, thereby absolving real perpetrators, the Zionists, of responsibility.
There were no mad, vengeful Muslims rampaging through that mall, senselessly murdering people, specifically targeting non-Muslims. This was done by the enemies of Islaam, the Zionists, whether real or fabricated.
In fact there is a plethora of evidence to indicate that this event, like so many others, was cleverly staged by Zionist operatives, who live in Kenya by the hundreds of thousands. In this regard it is important to note that when those original assessments were made of the creation of a Jewish homeland Kenya was top of the list, even over Palestine.
It’s the same story. Muslims going berserk in an act of murderous vengeance against the ‘infidels,’ for occupying and invading their countries. Right away, a supposedly jihadist Muslim group is blamed, in this case Somalis, through the nefarious entity, al-Shabab, which, like al-Qaeda, is non-existent in the Muslim world and is strictly an invention of the Mossad.
As always, there are no CCTV images, and surely no images or photos of the purported shooters. The non-existent shooters purportedly took out the security guards, a story that would make sense if this was real. Then, surely, with the ever-present armed Kenyan guards in this client Zionist state, surely those assaulting marauders would have been caught cleanly on the CCTV cameras. But not, never: no images of the supposed Islamic fanatics can be found anywhere.
As always, it is a one-word Arabic terminology-based nefarious Muslim group which is responsible.
As always, the blame against Islaam comes through the use of social media, where the ‘group’ claims responsibility, in this case through Twitter.
It’s all a Zionist plot, let there be no doubt about it. Expect more. This filth of the earth is losing its grip.
It was the Mossad which was responsible for blowing up the Nairobi-based US Embassy, senselessly murdering and injuring countless hundreds of people. Yet, the Kenyan government was the first to reject any Israeli-Zionist role and maliciously, as well as falsely, laid the blame on Islaam.
One hard proof that this is a Mossad plot is in the nature of the blame laid against Islaam, the extreme inanity of the claims—that is the claims of absolute ruthlessness. This is the statement about, “Do this or else: we’ll shoot you.” It is in regard to the claim that these never-to-be-seen, nonexistent Muslim terrorists demanded of people to either say the name of the Prophet’s mother and survive, and if not, be shot dead. This is typical of the Mossad, not any ‘Muslim’ group. Regardless, in such a state of shock many Muslims would likely have a mind block and may not know the answer. Even so, this didn’t happen: it was invented by Israeli spies.
It was barely a month ago that Kenya marked the 15th anniversary of the Israeli-orchestrated bombing, and while doing the Zionist-controlled Kenyan media continued to falsely blame Muslims and Islaam, going further to claim that the Kenyan government and military was having difficulty “containing” the omnipresent and presumably ‘Islamist’ terrorist threats to its land )(see http://www.voanews.com/content/confronting-terror-in-east-africa-15-years-after-us-embassy-bombings/1725139.html).
Now, a little over a month later this mall ‘event’ occurs, and it can be no coincidence. It can be no happenstance event, that is that while the Zionist-orchestrated Cameron (UK) government and the Obama White House are reeling from the revelations that they are the true and obvious source of global terror: it can be no coincidence that, then, this happens.
It means that in no way did a real Muslim/Islaamic group storm the mall and massacre anyone.
It took a great deal of effort to unwind Sandy Hook and the Boston Hoax to bring forth the truth. The Nairobi false flag is extensive, with countless actors and fraudsters play their typical fabricating roles. Thus, it will take a significant effort to unwind this also.
Even so, here, major revelations are shown, merely from a cursory analysis of the images as well as claims. In other words, there is evidence that, once again, the injuries and emotional reactions, the supposed grief and fright, were faked for public consumption and for revival of support for the Zionist cause, which is the fake War on Terror which is really a war on Islaaam.
That’s because Islaam is the last bastion of resistance against the criminal Zionists. Criminals: not satisfied with the fake Navy Shipyard scam, now they impose the Nairobi fraud upon the world.
Crisis actors, moulage, blood paks: all over again?
Notice this woman. Notice the patterns in her shirt. Those red areas are largely rectangular in shape. Notice, too, the tie-around clothing. In all likelihood this woman is not injured and is, rather, a crisis actor paid for the role.
This is a major revelation, which means the entire claim of an Islamist attack against Nairobi mall shoppers is a categorical hoax.
Westgate-Mall-attack-Nairobi-300x319
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/files/2013/09/Westgate-Mall-attack-Nairobi-300×319.jpg
A close-up view demonstrates the rectangular shape with the clothing tie acting to fix, that is to fix the blood packet against her white shirt. Same color, same fakery as the Boston hoax and more. As pointed out by one of our posters, too, it is the wrong color for blood. Regardless, where are the entrance wounds from the gun-blasts? Even so, if she was shot in the abdomen in two places at relatively close range she wouldn’t be walking about for the Reuter’s camera shoot.
nairobi
The rectangular shape, right screen, plus the use of the clothing tie is a give-away for the use of fake blood packs in this individual.
The following video is filled with evidence of set-ups, staging, fakery, fake fright, fake shock, and fake wounded. Watch it carefully. The evidence will be clear. The Zionist-controlled Kenyan media is all over the place, people with dozens of cameras, people showing no fright, fear, or caution about being shot or their being gunman on the loose, that is except the crisis actors, most of whom appear to be non-Kenyan.
These non-Kenyans are Zionist agents, many of whom are likely Kenyan-based Jews, Sayanim agents working for the Mossad. Therefore, if anyone was shot in that mall, it was the Mossad and its collaborators who did so, not any Muslim terrorists.
Yet, there is no proof of anyone being shot. Still images are insufficient. The real proof is in CCTV camera images. No such images have ben shown.

Notice the immense and deliberate degree of staging and how they staged the fright scenes. Also, see how after the Jewish-appearing woman comes forth with her two children, behind her there is a woman acting as if injured. That woman in white, once again, is a crisis actor.
Picture 431
Note, again, the rectangular nature of the red color, both on the abdominal area (actually, mere fake color staining her sweatshirt) and the repeated shapes on her arm. Furthermore, if she really did have two gunshot wounds what was she doing casually walking behind the other crisis actress, the mother with the two children? This woman is not injured. It is a fake.
nairobifraud
Once again, this is moulage, fake application of phony red coloring to imitate blood. See the fact that the Kenyans got wise from the Boston hoax. They stuffed the red packet underneath the clothing and, then, popped it. Same on the arm. This is 100% proof that the Nairobi mall shooting is a hoax; no one was injured; nobody died.
Did the Mossad combine crisis actors, fake grievers, fake shock victims, and other phonies with a real killing? Further analysis is needed to determine the plausibility of such a claim. Yet, thus far the evidence points to a fake event, a hoax, perpetrated by the Kenyan government in collaboration with the UK, the Zionist entity, and the Obama White House.
Regardless, there is no way in a real event that all such camera shoots could be so thoroughly staged, and they are obviously staged by any analysis. Therefore, the Nairobi mall shooting is a hoax, like all the others. Let anyone prove otherwise.
Important finding: blood pack in the child’s sock
Here is another proof of the hoax. Is this child really injured? Same as the Boston hoax, one shoe on, one shoe off with fake blood permeating a sock? Watch the hands in the screen. The person raps the gurney, then, twice, raps the child’s feet. After this, additional red material drips from the sock.
Picture 434
Caption: taps the gurney; fake blood doesn’t flow; so reaches to the feet and then…
Picture 436

taps the feet, twice.

Picture 437

Then, additional fake blood drips out. Note also the streaks of the phony material. NO ONE would do this in a real emergency when a person has been shot in the foot. This triple confirms that the mall shooting is a fake, and the only ones with the motives to do so are Zionist Jews, who have great power over the Kenyan government.
With a real victim would anyone dare rap the gurney with a person in pain from a gunshot wound? Would anyone in a million years twice rap a gunshot foot in child supposedly writhing in pain, while also pounding on the gurney? It would appear that the only reason this would be done is that this is a fake, and the ‘rapper’ is attempting to cause more moulage red to flow.
This man, a future presidential candidate, said he was right there, witnessing it all. ‘I saw a security guard shot it the head,’ who ‘died instantly.’ Really? Then, there should be a bit of CCTV camera footage available demonstrating the actual killing.
Picture 443
He also claims he was grazed in the head, “See, here? I was also shot at and, see, I suffered a graze wound.’ The man is a liar and a fraud, like the others.
These are what graze wounds from gunshots look like. He had no graze wound. It is incredible how many people have sold their souls to their Zionist masters: for a paltry gain.
49DownloadedFile-3
Then, there is always this, another non-Kenyan in on the act? Talk about hyper-realistic:
article-2427892-1822EB0F00000578-706_964x630-1
Oil, grease, tempura paint, fake blood, fake shock, and more: it’s a hoax, like the others, imposed upon the world by the criminal Zionist mob, this woman herself clearly being a non-Kenyan (non-black African) Zionist agent. It would appear, too,. that her shirt has been cut, also, that fake fluids have been spilled near her head and also above her. For this Zionist fraudster—Jewish woman with moulage on her face, hand, and fake dust-matting on her hair—there is no way that this could be anything other than an act: it is called, here, a fraud.
See any bullet wounds, anywhere?
This is further proof that this is a hoax.

Comments-
  1. CIS staged mall attacks – link between Woolwich “killing” and MI6?
    http://aangirfan.blogspot.ca/2013/09/cia-attacks-mall-shoppers.html
    Even more interesting are some of the comments on this article.
    1. The photographer Tyler Hicks always seems to be there to capture the moment.
    Smells of psyop.
    What is the chance that this top notch photographer would be in the mall to “record the event”
    Tyler Hicks, who always somehow seems to be at the hottest of hot spots and war zones when things explode, did it again today, improbably being inside the mall in Nairobi when the bomb went off.
A WESTFIELD SHOPPING CENTRE – Owned by none other than Frank Lowy!
  1. ‘these global shopping centres you own seem to attract a suspiciously unusual amount of terrorist activity Frank!’


  1. -11 September 2001: New York, the WTC complex buildings 1, 2, and 7 along with Westfield Hotel were ruined in the 9/11 attacks, and consequently about $5.4 billion went into the pockets of Lowy and Silverstein.
    -21 September 2005: Westfield Mall in Perth, Australia, bomb threat.
    -17 May 2006: Westfield in Woden, Australia, bomb threat.
    -21 July 2007: Court house adjacent Westfield Centre Derby, England, bomb threat, which caused evacuation of Westfield premises.
    -01 March 2008: Westfield Old Orchard Mall, Skokie, Illinois, bomb threat.
    -20 April 2009: Westfield Hotel Annapolis, bomb threat.
    -20 September 2008: Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan, bombing.
    -17 July 2008: Marriott Hotel in Jakarta, Indonesia, bombing.
    -August 2012: London… wait, that one didn’t quite happen for ya did it Frank!)
    Frank Lowy is a dual citizen (Australia/Israel) who also cashed in with “Lucky Larry” on 9/11.
    http://crimesofzion.blogspot.ca/2007/05/frank-lowy-zionism-and-911.html
    Portion of article, more on site – Fifty days before 9/11, Larry Silverstein’s Silverstein Properties and Frank Lowy’s Westfield America secured a 99-year lease on World Trade Center Buildings One, Two, Four and Five. Silverstein already owned Building Seven, aka the Salomon building. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey handed over control of the World Trade Center to Silverstein and Lowy on July 24, 2001, an “historic” agreement and “one of the largest privatization initiatives in history.”
    Lowy leased the shopping concourse area called the Mall at the World Trade Center, made up of approximately 427,000 square feet of retail floor space. Silverstein and Westfield America insured the complex for $3.55 billion, but after the attacks of September 11 lodged a claim for $7.1 billion on the premise that each plane collision constituted a separate act of terrorism, doubling the payout.
  2. Lowry is implicated in orchestration of 9/11 false flag terror attack - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/2013/02/israel-did-911-all-proof-in-world.html
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

From http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ca/- Sept 24:

Kenyan Bloodbath: State-Sponsored Sophistication & Motivation

Anti-ICC Kenyan President and his government appear to be the target of US-bolstered Al Qaeda attack.

San Diego woman Elaine Dang was injured in the Nairobi shopping mall attack Saturday. She was escorted to safety and later tweeted a picture of her recovery in the hospital.

SIEGFRIED MODOLA/REUTERS

September 24, 2013 (Tony Cartalucci) - What are the chances that family members of Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta just so happened to be visiting Nairobi's Westgate Mall in the midst of an unprecedented cross-border attack by Al Qaeda Al Shabaab terrorists - and that these family members were successfully singled out and murdered? The BBC reported in its article, "Nairobi Westgate attack: The victims," that:
President Uhuru Kenyatta's nephew Mbugua Mwangi and his fiancee Rosemary Wahito are among the many Kenyans killed in the attack on the Westgate shopping centre.
What are the chances that Al Qaeda is armed and funded by the US from Afghanistan in the 1980's, to Libya in 2011, and now Syria to undermine enemies of Wall Street and London, but not in Somalia to undermine neighboring Kenya whose new president won partly due to a popular backlash against the West's discredited International Criminal Court (ICC)?

Indeed, Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta was charged by the ICC for "crimes against humanity" even as he ran for president. The Kenyan newspaper, the Standard, published "Is history repeating itself as Uhuru Kenyatta, like father, faces trial?," where current President Kenyatta's persecution by the ICC is seen as a parallel to the persecution of his father, Jomo Kenyatta, by British colonial rule. It stated:
In April 2011, Ngengi Muigai, a close relative of Uhuru drew parallels between his charges at the ICC and the trial, jailing and unlawful detention of his father by the British colonial government.
How much can a wife and a mother bear? Her husband's tribulations from the British colonialists and now her son from the neo-colonialists said Ngengi.
Mama Ngina had said at the same venue: I'm sure Uhuru, Ruto and the rest will go to The Hague and come back so that we can proceed with nation building.
She said this on the day she laid hands on both her son and Ruto as she prayed for their safe return from The Hague.
She said the charges facing her son and his co-suspects were the work of neo-colonialists and urged Kenyans to stand by Uhuru and resist just like they had resisted the British colonial rule.
The colonialists gave us problems and it is now clear they have never relented, said the former First Lady.
The former first lady is not alone in viewing the ICC as the modern day successor of old European subjugation and colonization. President Kenyatta's persecution by the ICC is a tell-tale sign that he has made enemies in the West. The ICC itself is a discredited institution openly collaborating alongside NATO and in particular, the US, UK, and France to target political enemies around the world.


This would be made abundantly clear in Libya in 2011, where the ICC played a crucial role in NATO's propaganda campaign against Tripoli when ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo "confirmed" that Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi's son Saif Al-Islam was "captured" by Libyan militants and en route to the Hague. Saif Al-Islam would turn up the next day, very much free and still leading the defense of Tripoli - meaning the ICC lied as part of a wider NATO psychological operation to portray Libya's capital as overwhelmed and captured.

The ICC, is wholly rejected by the African Union (AU), as noted by the Economist's piece, "Shooting your own feet," where it states:
Heads of state from across the continent gathered in Addis Ababa, the Ethiopian capital, on May 27th to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the African Union and its forerunner, the Organisation of African Unity. They congratulated themselves on how well they had supposedly co-operated in decades past, then spiced things up a little by firing off broadsides at the International Criminal Court in The Hague. Led by the Ethiopian prime minister, Hailemariam Desalegn, who chairs the union at the moment, they variously accused the court of racism and “hunting” Africans.
The Economist, with its usual neo-imperialist hubris, maintained that respecting the ICC would be essential for the continued rise of Africa, as it was part of the "international rules" Africa must follow in order to continue attracting foreign investment.

When an arrest warrant was issued for Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi by the Western institution, the AU rejected it as well. AP reported in their article, "African Union disregards Gaddafi arrest warrant," that:
The body representing African nations has called on its members to disregard the arrest warrant issued for Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, in a move that will seriously weaken the International Criminal Court's ability to bring him to justice.
The crumbling of the West's "international institutions" represents a decline in their global influence and their ability to empty the third world of its resources for their own benefit. Those on the African continent and elsewhere that challenge the West's international order, pay for it with swift reprisals be they crippling economic sanctions, covert military operations, or in Libya's case, full scale military aggression.

That Kenya's new president was elected in what could be easily interpreted as a major slight against the already teetering legitimacy of the ICC and the corporate-financier interests that contrived and currently perpetuate the institution, appears to be the most compelling motive behind the recent attack in Nairobi. If nations are allowed to openly defy and erode the West's status as self-proclaimed international arbiter, the very large house of geopolitical socioeconomic cards built upon this shaky table will fall with it.

Indeed, just as the West used listed terror organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) in Libya, and now the Al Nusra front in Syria, to target and overthrow governments of their disliking, Al Shabaab who maintains direct ties to both of these terror organizations appears to have been turned loose on Kenya.

The attack in Nairobi represents a scale and level of sophistication that requires state-sponsorship and intelligence on par with at least that inside Kenya in order to target and murder the president's family members. That state sponsorship most certainly is not somewhere in Kenya's northern neighbor of Somalia, but more likely in Washington, London, Paris, Tel Aviv, Doha and/or Riyadh.

Attacking a mall full of civilians, at face value, represents very low-level short-sighted strategic thinking, however the scale of the operation, and considering that the president's family members were present and singled out, indicates a much higher level of sophistication - a level of sophistication that would easily determine that such an attack would serve to galvanize the Kenyan public behind US AFRICOM's military adventurism across Africa in pursuit of "Al Qaeda," Kony, and others, not against it.

As the facts continue to emerge, and with Western leaders calling on the world to once again quickly and collectively react based on emotions of rage, hatred, and fear, the basic questions of "qui bono?" and who actually possessed the operational capacity to carry out or at least steer such and attack, must be asked and answered. If indeed Al Shabaab carried out this attack, were they armed, funded, and steered by Western special interests as their associates within the ranks of LIFG and Al Nusra are in Libya and Syria? What pressure will Kenya be put under in the wake of this attack by the West to act out across its borders in tandem with ongoing AFRICOM campaigns?

For Kenya's future, reason and facts must prevail - not emotions and propaganda.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

To summarize: This was another blatantly staged false flag style terror attack orchestrated by sycophantic megalomaniacs, attempting to rule Earth from the shadows; hidden within Mossad, world Jewry, USA alphabet agencies, and other shadowy non governmental organizations, in collaboration to steer global events and launch illegal wars.  

The fact that the purported terrorist group is making statements that they will strike again is really just another promise of more false flags from the powers that shouldn't be.






MUST SEE! Is Alleged Nairobi Terror Mastermind "The White Widow" An MI5 Agent? Did She Set-up 7/7 - YouTube

Published on Sep 23, 2013
Im calling shenanigans on the prime suspect in the Kenyan attack. Samanta Lewthwaite is now connected to 2 terror attacks - Nairobi, and 7/7.

She was married to one of the 7/7 "bombers". At the time the police looked into her but she was not charged for anything in relation to 7/7.

With 7/7 being such a blatent inside job, and her now popping up again as a terrorist mastermind, is it too much to think she is actually an MI5 double agent?

Why the White Widow is prime suspect: Kenyan anti-terror police believe British woman, 29, may be behind mall massacre
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...
Obama's Link to Kenyan Mall Massacre Revealed

Breaking: Obama's Link to Kenyan Mall Massacre Revealed - YouTube
Published on Sep 23, 2013
Alex is joined via Skype by Reporter and Author Dr. Jerome Corsi to discuss the updates coming out of Kenya involving the Muslim Brotherhood, their involveement in attacks and how it is connected to Obama.
http://www.wnd.com/author/jcorsi/
Stay in the know - Follow Alex on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones

No comments:

Post a Comment